I'm sure anyone that's heard of the Montauk Monster would like to be let it on what it is.  Well, that may take a while, because the tards people that found the rotting carcass in mid-July aren't revealing the location of the dead beast.  They are asking for a scientist to look at the decomposed remains, however, just for the sake of finding out what the hell it is.

Taken from FoxNews.com :

"It exists," Rachel Goldberg, Courtney Fruin and Jenna Hewitt asserted on local cable channel Plum TV, denying suspicions that they'd Photoshopped a picture of a dead dog.

But pressed by interviewer Nick Leighton about where the animal was now, the semi-glamorous trio suddenly got cagey.

"It decomposed in our friend's back yard," said Goldberg. "It's been since removed ... by friends of ours."

"You're a little shady with the details," observed Leighton. "You planning to write a book about this?"

Goldberg only shrugged and nodded with a faint smile.

"We're hoping to have scientists contact us to find out what it is," she conceded. "It's in a box."

But is all this hype over what this thing is just a load of hot air? Is everyone just getting excited over a dead raccoon?

Yeah, you heard me.  A raccoon.

I don't think it's a raccoon... Jeff Corwin, however, thinks otherwise:

"Animal Planet" wildlife expert Jeff Corwin appeared on FOX News Channel to proclaim that we're all suckers.

"What you think is a beak is actually the canine teeth," Corwin told Bill Hemmer and Megyn Kelly. "What we have is an incredibly rare" — dramatic pause — "raccoon."

I personally think it's a dog.  Maybe a somewhat deformed dog, but a dog nonetheless.  This new picture reveals a little bit more of what the "monster" looks like.  (it also reveals that it is certainly a manly man.)

Draw your own conclusions... just what is the Montauk Monster?

Montaulk Monster

If you liked this post, stay updated. Follow me on Twitter or subscribe to our RSS Feed via email.

Post Tags: ,

Related Posts

Like this post? Spread it!